Mark 11:15-19;22-33 (Wednesday Evening Bible Study)

Mark 11:15-19;22-33

  • Mark 11:15-19
  • 15 They came to Jerusalem, and he went into the temple and began to throw out those buying and selling. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the chairs of those selling doves, 16 and would not permit anyone to carry goods through the temple. 17 He was teaching them: “Is it not written, My house will be called a house of prayer for all nations? But you have made it a den of thieves!” 18 The chief priests and the scribes heard it and started looking for a way to kill him. For they were afraid of him, because the whole crowd was astonished by his teaching. 19 Whenever evening came, they would go out of the city.
    • This story will be easier for us to understand if we know the layout of the Temple precincts
    • There are two closely connected words used in the NT
      • Hieron, which means the sacred place
      • This included the whole Temple area
        • This covered the top of Mount Zion and was about thirty acres in extent
        • It was surrounded by great walls which varied on each side, 1,300 to 1,000 feet long
        • There was a wide outer space called the Court of the Gentiles
          • Into it, anyone, Jew or Gentile could come
          • At the inner edge of the Court of the Gentiles was a low wall with tablets set into it which said that if a Gentile passed that point the penalty was death
        • The next court was called the Court of the Women
          • It was so called because unless women had come actually to offer sacrifice they might not proceed further
        • Next was the Court of the Israelites
          • In it the congregation gathered on great occasions, and from it the offerings were handed by the worshippers to the priests
        • The inmost court was the Court of the Priests
      • Naos means the Temple proper
        • It was in the Court of the Priests that the Temple stood
      • The whole area, including the different Courts, was the sacred precincts
      • The special building within the Court of the Priests was the Temple
    • This incident took place in the Court of the Gentiles
      • Bit by bit, the Court of the Gentiles had become almost entirely secularized
      • It had been meant to be a place of prayer and preparation, but there was in the time of Jesus a commercialized atmosphere of buying and selling which made prayer and mediation impossible
      • Even worse, the business which went on there was sheer exploitation of the pilgrims
        • Every Jew had to pay a temple tax of one half-shekel a year
          • This was equivalent to nearly two days wages for a working man
          • It could only be paid in one particular kind of coinage, the shekels of the sanctuary
          • It was paid at the time of the Passover 
          • Jews came form all over the world to the Passover and with all kinds of currencies
          • Changing their currency incurred a fee, and should their coin exceed the tax, they had to pay another fee before they got their change 
          • Most pilgrims had to pay this extra commission before they could pay their tax, and the commission amounted to half a day’s wage, which for most was a great deal of money
        • As for the sellers of doves—doves entered largely into the sacrificial system
          • They had to be without blemish
          • Doves could be bought cheaply enough outside, but the Temple inspectors would be sure to find something wrong with them, and worshippers were advised to buy them at the Temple stalls
          • The price of a pair of doves inside could be as much as fifteen times the price that might be paid outside
          • Again it was sheer imposition, and what made matters worse was that this business of buying and selling belonged to the family of Annas who had been high priest
            • The Jews themselves were well aware of this abuse
            • Rabbi Simon ben Gamaliel called for the price to be reduced to a silver piece from a gold piece in the Talmud
            • It was the fact that poor, humble pilgrims were being swindled which moved Jesus to wrath
            • The same situation still happens in Mecca. Pilgrims find themselves in the middle of a noisy uproar, where the one aim of the sellers is to exact as high a price as possible and where the pilgrims argue and defend themselves with equal fierceness
    • Jesus used a vivid metaphor to describe the Temple court
      • The road from Jerusalem to Jericho was notorious for its robbers (Same road used in the parable of the Good Samaritan)
      • It was a narrow winding road, passing between rocky gorges
      • Among the rocks were caves where the robbers lay in wait
      • Jesus was basically saying there were worse robbers in the Temple courts than ever there were in the caves of the Jericho road
    • Verse 16 has an odd statement that Jesus would not permit anyone to carry goods through the temple
      • The Temple court provided a short cut from the eastern part  of the city to the Mount of Olives
      • The Mishnah itself says, “A man may not enter into the Temple Mount with his staff or his sandal or his wallet, or with the dust upon his fee, nor may he make of it a short cut.”
      • Jesus was reminding the Jews of their own laws
      • In His time, Jews thought so little of the sanctity of the outer court of the Temple they used it as a thoroughfare on their business errands
      • It was their own laws that Jesus directed their attention, and it was their own prophets He quoted to them (Isaiah 56:7; Jeremiah 7:11)
    • What moved Jesus to such anger?
      • He was angry at the exploitation of the pilgrims
        • The Temple authorities were treating them not as worshippers, not even as human beings, but as things to be exploited for their own ends
        • The exploitation of one human being by another always provokes the wrath of God, and doubly so when it is made under the cloak of religion
      • He was angry at the desecration of God’s holy place
        • The sense of the presence of God in the house of God had been lost
        • Commercialization of the sacred was violating it
      • Is it possible that Jesus had an even deeper anger?
        • He quoted Isaiah 56:7
        • I will bring them to my holy mountain and let them rejoice in my house of prayer. Their burnt offerings and sacrifices will be acceptable on my altar, for my house will be called a house of prayer for all nations.”
        • Yet in that very same house there was a wall beyond which to pass was a death sentence for Gentiles
        • It may well be that Jesus was moved to anger by the exclusiveness of Jewish worship and that He wished to remind them that God loved not just the Jews but the world
  • Mark 11:22-26
  • 22 Jesus replied to them, “Have faith in God. 23 Truly I tell you, if anyone says to this mountain, ‘Be lifted up and thrown into the sea,’ and does not doubt in his heart, but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. 24 Therefore I tell you, everything you pray and ask for—believe that you have received it and it will be yours. 25 And whenever you stand praying, if you have anything against anyone, forgive him, so that your Father in heaven will also forgive you your wrongdoing.”
    • We have noticed more than once how certain sayings of Jesus stuck in people’s minds although the occasion on which He said them had been forgotten. That’s what we have here
      • Faith that can move mountains also occurs in Matthew 17:20 and Luke 17:6, and in each of the gospels it occurs in a quite different context
      • Jesus probably said it more than once and its real context had often been forgotten
      • The necessity of forgiving one another occurs in Matthew 6:12,14 again in a quite different context
      • We must approach these sayings as not so much having to do with the particular incidents, but as general rules which Jesus repeatedly laid down
    • This passage gives us three rules for prayer
      • It must be the prayer of faith
        • Moving mountains was a quite common Jewish phrase, meaning removing difficulties
        • It was used especially of wise teachers. A good teacher who could remove the difficulties which the minds of his students encountered was called a mountain-remover
        • So the phrase means that if we have real faith, prayer is a power which can solve any problem and make us able to deal with any difficulty
        • That involves two things
          • It involves that we should be willing to take our problems and our difficulties to God
            • Sometimes our problems are that we wish to obtain something we should not desire at all, that we wish to find a way to do something we should not even think of doing, that we wish to justify ourselves for doing something to which we should never lay our hands or apply our minds
            • One of the greatest tests of any problem is simply to say, “Can I take it to God and can I ask His help?”
          • It involves that we should be ready to accept God’s guidance when He gives it
            • It is the most common thing in the world for people to ask for advice when all they really want is approval for some action that they are already determined to take
            • It is useless to go to God and to ask for His guidance unless we are willing to be obedient enough to accept it
            • But if we do take our problems to God and are humble enough and brave enough to accept His guidance, there does come the power which can conquer the difficulties of thought and of action
      • It must be the prayer of expectation
        • It is the universal fact that anything tired in the spirit of confident expectation has a more than double chance of success
        • The patient who goes to a doctor and has no confidence in the prescribed remedies has far less chance of recovery than the patient who is confident that the doctor can provide a cure
        • When we pray, it must never be a mere formality or a ritual without hope
        • For many people prayer is either a pious ritual or a forlorn hope. It should be a thing of burning expectation
        • Maybe our trouble is that what we want from God is our answer, and we do not recognize His answer when it comes
      • It must be the prayer of charity
        • The prayers of bitter people cannot penetrated the wall of their own bitterness
        • If we are to speak with God there must be some bond between us and God
        • There can never be any intimacy between two people who have nothing in common
        • If the ruling principle of our hearts is bitterness, we have erected a barrier between ourselves and God
        • In such circumstances, if our prayers are to be answered we must first ask God to cleanse our hearts from the bitter spirit and put into them the spirit of love. Then we can speak to God and He can speak to us
  • Mark 11:27-33
  • 27 They came again to Jerusalem. As he was walking in the temple, the chief priests, the scribes, and the elders came 28 and asked him, “By what authority are you doing these things? Who gave you this authority to do these things?” 29 Jesus said to them, “I will ask you one question; then answer me, and I will tell you by what authority I do these things.  30 Was John’s baptism from heaven or of human origin? Answer me.” 31 They discussed it among themselves: “If we say, ‘From heaven,’ he will say, ‘Then why didn’t you believe him?’ 32 But if we say, ‘Of human origin’”—they were afraid of the crowd, because everyone thought that John was truly a prophet. 33 So they answered Jesus, “We don’t know.” And Jesus said to them, “Neither will I tell you by what authority I do these things.”
    • In the Temple courts, there were two famous covered porches, one on the east and one on the south side of the Court of the Gentiles
      • The one on the east was called Solomon’s Porch
        • It was a magnificent porch made by Corinthian columns 35 feet hight
      • The one of the south was called the Royal Porch
        • It was even more magnificent
        • It was formed by four rows of white marble columns, each six feet in diameter and 30 feet high
        • There were 162 of them
      • It was common for Rabbis and teachers to stroll in these columns and to teach as they walked
      • It was in these porches in the Temple that Jesus was walking and teaching
    • A group from the chief priests and the experts of the law came to Him. In reality, it was a group sent from the Sanhedrin
      • Their question really was the most natural question
        • For a private individual to clear the Court of the Gentiles of its accustomed and official traders was a staggering thing
        • So they asked Jesus, “By what authority are you doing these things? Who gave you this authority to do these things?”
      • They hosted to put Jesus into a dilemma
        • If He said He was acting under His own authority they could arrest Him as a megalomaniac before He did any further damage
        • If He said that He was acting on the authority of God they could arrest Him on an obvious charge of blasphemy, on the grounds that God would never give anyone authority to create a disturbance in the courts of His own house
      • Jesus saw quite clearly the dilemma in which they sought to involve Him, and His reply put them into a dilemma which was even worse
        • He would answer their question on one condition. “Was John’s baptism from heaven or of human origin?”
        • If they said it was divine, they knew that Jesus would ask why they hand stood out against it
          • If they said it was divine, Jesus could also reply that John had in fact pointed everyone to Him, and that therefore He was divinely attested and needed no further authority
          • If the members of the Sanhedrin agreed that John’s work was divine, they would be compelled to accept Jesus as the Messiah
        • If they said that John’s work was merely human, now that John had the added distinction of being a martyr, they knew quite well that the people around would cause a riot
        • So they were compelled to say weakly that they did not know, and thereby Jesus escaped the need to give them any answer to their question
    • The whole story is a vivid example of what happens to those who will not face the truth
      • They have to twist and get themselves in a position in which they are so helplessly involved that they have nothing to say 
      • Those who face the truth may have the humiliation of saying that they were wrong, or the peril of standing by it, but at least the future for them is strong and bright
      • Those who will not face the truth have nothing but the prospect of deeper and deeper involvement in a situation which renders them helpless and ineffective

Mark 11:1-14;20-21 (Wednesday Evening Bible Study)

Mark 11:1-14;20-21

  • Mark 11:1-6
  • When they approached Jerusalem, at Bethphage and Bethany near the Mount of Olives, he sent two of his disciples 2 and told them, “Go into the village ahead of you. As soon as you enter it, you will find a colt tied there, on which no one has ever sat. Untie it and bring it. 3 If anyone says to you, ‘Why are you doing this?’ say, ‘The Lord needs it and will send it back here right away.’” 4 So they went and found a colt outside in the street, tied by a door. They untied it, 5 and some of those standing there said to them, “What are you doing, untying the colt?” 6 They answered them just as Jesus had said; so they let them go.
    • We have come to the last stage of the journey
      • There had been the withdrawal to the north, to the territory around Caesarea Philippi
      • There had been the journey south, with a brief stop in Galilee
      • There had been the way to Judaea and the time in the hill country and beyond the Jordan
      • There had been the road through Jericho
      • Now comes Jerusalem
    • We have to note something without which the story is almost unintelligible
      • When we read the first three gospels, we get the idea that this was actually Jesus’ first visit to Jerusalem
        • The gospels, however, are short, and crammed into them is the work of three years
      • John’s gospel we find Jesus frequently in Jerusalem. In fact we find that He regularly went up to Jerusalem for the great feasts
      • The first three gospels are specially interested in the Galilean ministry
      • John is interested in the ministry in Judea
      • The first three all of indications that Jesus was frequently in Jerusalem as well
        • There is His close friendship with Lazarus, Martha, and Mary at Bethany, which speaks of many visits
        • There is the fact that Joseph of Arimathea was Hi secret friend
        • Jesus’ own words in Matthew 23:37
          • 37 “Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her. How often I wanted to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing!
          • Jesus could not have said that unless there had previously been more than one appeal which had been met with a cold response
        • This is one explanation of the incident with the colt
          • Jesus did not leave things until the last moment
          • He knew what He was going to do and possibly long ago, He had made arrangements with a friend
          • The disciples being sent ahead may have been pre-arranged
          • In any case, this was not a sudden, reckless decision of Jesus. It was something to which all His life had been building up
    • Bethphage and Bethany were villages near Jerusalem
      • Bethphage means house of figs
      • Bethany means house of dates
      • Jewish lawed that Bethphage was one of the circle of villages which makes the limit of a Sabbath day’s journey, less than a mile
      • Bethany was one of the recognized lodging places for pilgrims to the Passover when Jerusalem was full
    • When words failed to move people the prophets of old idd something dramatic as if to say “If you will not hear, you must be compelled to see”
      • These dramatic actions were what we might call acted warnings or dramatic sermons
      • Jesus’ action was a deliberate dramatic claim to be the Messiah
        • But we must be careful to note just what He was doing
        • Zechariah 9:9
          • Rejoice greatly, Daughter Zion! Shout in triumph, Daughter Jerusalem! Look, your King is coming to you; he is righteous and victorious, humble and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.
        • The whole impact s that the King was coming in peace
        • In Palestine the donkey was not a despised animal, but a noble one
        • When a king went to war he rode on a horse, when he came in peace he rode on a donkey
        • In the time of Jesus, a donkey was the animal used to bear kings
        • But we must note what kind of a King Jesus was claiming to be
          • He came meek and lowly
          • He came in peace and for peace
          • They greeted Him as the Son of David, but they did not understand
          • They were looking for a king who would shatter and smash and break
          • Jesus knew it—and He came meek and lowly, riding on a donkey
    • When Jesus rode into Jerusalem that day, he claimed to be King, but He claimed to be King of peace
    • His actions were a contradiction of everything that was hoped for and expected
  • Mark 11:7-10
  • 7 They brought the colt to Jesus and threw their clothes on it, and he sat on it. 8 Many people spread their clothes on the road, and others spread leafy branches cut from the fields. 9 Those who went ahead and those who followed shouted: Hosanna! Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord! 10 Blessed is the coming kingdom of our father David! Hosanna in the highest heaven!
    • The colt they brought Jesus had never been ridden
    • That was fitting, for an animal to be used for a sacred purpose must never have been used for any other purpose
      • It was so with the red heifer whose ashes cleansed from pollution (Numbers 19; Deuteronomy 21)
    • The whole picture is of a people who misunderstood
      • It shows a crowd thinking of kingship in the terms of conquest in which they had thought of it for so long
        • It is reminiscent of how Simon Maccabaeus entered Jerusalem 150 years before, after he had blasted Israel’s enemies in battle
        • It was a conqueror’s welcome they sought to give Jesus, but they never dreamed of the kind of conqueror He wished to be
      • The very shouts the crowd raised to Jesus showed how their thoughts were running
        • When they spread their garments on the ground before Him, they did exactly what the crowd did when the man of blood, Jehu, was anointed king (II Kings 9)
        • They shouted “Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the Lord!” Which is a quotation from Psalm 118:26, and should read a little differently, “Blessed in the name of the Lord is the one who is coming”
        • There are three things to note about that shout
          • It was the regular greeting with which pilgrims were addressed when they reached the Temple on the occasion of the great feasts
          • The one who comes was another name for the Messiah. When the Jews spoke about the Messiah, they talked of Him as the One who is coming
          • But it is the whole origin of the Psalm from which the words come that makes them supremely suggestive
            • 167 B.C. Syrian king Antiochus conceived it his duty to be a missionary of Hellenism and to introduce the Greek way of life, Greek thought, and Greek religion wherever he could, even by force
              • He tried to do this in Palestine
              • To possess the law or circumcised a child were crimes punishable by death
              • He desecrated the Temple courts
              • Instituted the worship of Zeus in the Temple
              • Opened brothels in the chambers around the Temple
              • Offered pig’s flesh on the great altar of the burnt offering
              • He did everything he could to wipe out the Jewish faith
            • It was then that Judas Maccabaeus arose; and after an amazing career of conquest, in 163 B.C. he drove Antiochus out and repurified and reconsecrated the Temple, an even which the Feast of the Dedication, or the Feast of Hanukkah, still commemorates
            • And in all probability Psalm 118 was written to commemorate that great day of purification and the battle which Judas Maccabaeus won
            • It is a conqueror’s psalm
    • Again and again we see the same thing happening in this incident
      • Jesus had claimed to be the Messiah, but in such a way as to try to show that the popular ideas of the Messiah were misguided
      • But the people could not see it Their welcome was one which befitted not the King of love but the conqueror who would shatter the enemies of Israel
        • In verses 9 and 10 there is the word Hosanna
        • The word is consistently misunderstood
        • It is quoted and used as if it meant praise; but it is a simple transliteration of the Hebrew for “Save now!” It occurs in exactly the same form in II Samuel 14:4 and II Kings 6:26, where it is used by people seeking for help and protection at the hands of the king
        • When the people shouted Hosanna it was not a cry of praise to Jesus, which it often sound like when we quote it
        • It was a cry to God to break in and save His people not that the Messiah had come
    • No incident shows the sheer courage of Jesus as this does
      • In the circumstances one might have expected Him to enter Jerusalem secretly and to keep hidden from the authorities who were out to destroy Him
      • Instead He entered in such a way that the attention of every eye was focused upon Him
      • One of the most dangerous things that anyone can do is to go to people and tell them that all their accepted ideas are wrong
      • Here see Jesus making the last appeal of love and making it with a courage that is heroic
  • Mark 11:11
  • 11 He went into Jerusalem and into the temple. After looking around at everything, since it was already late, he went out to Bethany with the Twelve.
    • This simple verse shows us two things about Jesus which were typical of Him
      • It shows us Jesus deliberately summing up His task
        • The whole atmosphere of the last days was one of deliberation
        • Jesus was not recklessly punting into unknown dangers. He was doing everything with His eyes wide open
        • When He looked at everything, He was like a commander summing up the strength of the opposition and His own resources preparatory to the decisive battle
      • It shows us where Jesus got His strength
        • He went back to the peace of Bethany
        • Before He joined battle with the world, He sought the presence of God
        • It was only because each day He faced God that He could face the world’s challenge with such courage
    • This brief passage also shows us something about the disciples
      • They were still with Him
        • By this time it must have been quite plain to them that Jesus was committing suicide, as it seemed to them
        • Sometimes we criticize them for their lack of loyalty in the last days, but it says something for them, that, little as they understood what was happening, they still stood by Him
  • Mark 11:12-14;20-21
  • 12 The next day when they went out from Bethany, he was hungry. 13 Seeing in the distance a fig tree with leaves, he went to find out if there was anything on it. When he came to it, he found nothing but leaves; for it was not the season for figs. 14 He said to it, “May no one ever eat fruit from you again!” And his disciples heard it…20 Early in the morning, as they were passing by, they saw the fig tree withered from the roots up. 21 Then Peter remembered and said to him, “Rabbi, look! The fig tree that you cursed has withered.”
    • Although in Mark’s gospel the story of the fig tree is divided into two, we take it as one
    • The first part of the story happened on the morning of one day, and the second part on the morning of the next day, with the cleansing of the Temple in between. But, when we are trying to see the meaning of the story, we are better to take it as one
    • There can be no doubt that this, without exception, is the most difficult story in the gospel narrative. To take it as literal history presents difficulties which are almost impossible to overcome
      • The story of does not ring true. To be honest, the whole incident does not seem very worthy of Jesus
        • Jesus had always refused to use His miraculous powers for His own sake. He would not turn the stones into bread to satisfy His own hunger. He would not use His miraculous powers to escape from His enemies. And yet here He uses His power to blast a Tre which had disappointed Him when He was hungry
      • Worse, the whole action was unreasonable
        • This was Passover Season, that is, the middle of April
        • The fig tree in a sheltered spot may bear leaves as early as March, but never did a fig tree bear figs until late May or June
      • The whole story does not seem to fit Jesus at all. What are we to say about it?
        • It we are to take this story as something that actually happened, we must take it as an enacted parable
        • We must in fact take it as one of those prophetic, symbolic, dramatic actions
        • If we take it that way, it may be interpreted as the condemnation of two things
          • It is the condemnation of promise without fulfillment
            • The leaves on the tree might be taken as the promise of fruity, but there was no fruit there
            • It is the condemnation especially of the people of Israel
            • All their history was a preparation for the coming of God’s chose one. The whole promise of their national record was that when the chosen one came they would be eager to receive Him. But when He did come, that promise was tragically unfulfilled
            • If this incident is an enacted parable it is the condemnation of unfulfilled promise
          • It is the condemnation of profession without practice
            • It might be taken that the tree with its leaves professed to offer something and did not
            • The whole cry of the NT is that we can be known only by the fruits of our lives
            • We cannot claim to be followers of Jesus Christ and remain entirely unique the Master whom we profess to love
          • If this incident is to be taken literally and is an enacted parable, that must be the meaning. But, relevant as these lessons may be, it seems difficult to extract them from the incident, because it was quite unreasonable to expect the fig tree to bear figs when the time for figs was still six weeks away
        • Luke does not relate this incident at all, but he has the parable of the fruitless fig tree (Luke 13:6-9)
          • Now that parable ends indecisively. The master of the vineyard wished to root up the tree. The gardener pleaded for another chance. The last chance was given; and it was agreed that if the tree bore fruit it should be spared, and if not it should be destroyed
          • May it not be that this incident is a kind of continuation of that parable?
          • The people of Israel had had their chance. They had failed to bear fruit. And now was the time for their destruction
          • It has been plausibly suggested that on the road from Bethany to Jerusalem there was a lonely withered fig tree. It may well be that Jesus said to His disciples, “You remember the parable I told you about the fruitless fig tree? Israel is still fruitless and will be blasted as that tree.”
          • It may well be that that lonely tree became associated in people’s minds with a saying of Jesus about the fate of fruitlessness, and so the story arose
      • It seems to us to be in some way connected with the parable of the fruitless tree. But in any event the whole lesson of the incident is that uselessness invites disaster

Mark 10:32-52 (Wednesday Evening Bible Study)

Mark 10:32-52

  • Mark 10:32-34
  • 32 They were on the road, going up to Jerusalem, and Jesus was walking ahead of them. The disciples were astonished, but those who followed him were afraid. Taking the Twelve aside again, he began to tell them the things that would happen to him. 33 “See, we are going up to Jerusalem. The Son of Man will be handed over to the chief priests and the scribes, and they will condemn him to death. Then they will hand him over to the Gentiles, 34 and they will mock him, spit on him, flog him, and kill him, and he will rise after three days.”
    • Jesus and His disciples were entering upon the last scene. Jesus had set His course definitely and irrevocably to Jerusalem and the cross
      • There had been the withdrawal to the north, to the territory around Caesarea Philippi
      • There had been the journey south, with a brief stop in Galilee
      • There had been the way to Judaea and the time in the hill country and beyond the Jordan
      • And now the final stage, the road to Jerusalem
    • This story tells us of the loneliness of Jesus
      • They were going along the road and He was out ahead of them, alone
      • There are certain decisions which can only be taken alone
      • There are certain decisions which must be taken and detain roads that must be walked in the awful loneliness of our own souls
      • Yet in the deepest sense of all, even in these times, we are not along, of never is God nearer to us
    • This story tells us of the courage of Jesus
      • Three times Jesus has foretold the things that were to happen to Him in Jerusalem, and each time they grow grimmer and some further detail of horror is included
      • There are two kinds of courage
        • The courage which is a kind of instinctive reaction, almost a reflex, the courage of those who are confronted out of the blue with a crisis to which they instinctively react, scarcely having time to think
        • The courage of those who see the grim thing approaching far ahead, whole have plenty of time to turn back, who could, if they chose, evade the issue, and who yet go on
        • There is no doubt which is the higher courage; this known deliberate facing of the future. That is the courage Jesus showed
        • If no higher verdict was possible, it would still be true to say of Jesus that He ranks with the heroes of the world
    • This story tells of the personal magnetism of Jesus
      • The disciples were sure that Jesus was the Messiah
      • They were equally sure that He was going to die
      • To them these two facts did not make sense when put together
      • Yet they followed. To them everything was dark except one thing—they loved Jesus, and however much they wished to, they could not leave Him
  • Mark 10:35-40
  • 35 James and John, the sons of Zebedee, approached him and said, “Teacher, we want you to do whatever we ask you. 36 “What do you want me to do for you?” he asked them. 37 They answered him, “Allow us to sit at your right and at your left in your glory.” 38 Jesus said to them, “You don’t know what you’re asking. Are you able to drink the cup I drink or to be baptized with the baptism I am baptized with?” 39 “We are able,” they told him. Jesus said to them, “You will drink the cup I drink, and you will be baptized with the baptism I am baptized with. 40 But to sit at my right or left is not mine to give; instead, it is for those for whom it has been prepared.”
    • This story tells us something about Mark
      • Matthew puts the request at the mother of James and John, Salome
      • This story shows us the honesty of Mark
        • It’s Mark’s aim to show us the disciples, warts and all. And Mark was right, because the disciples were not a company of saints
        • They were ordinary men
        • It was with people like ourselves that Jesus set out to change the world—and did it
      • This story tells us something about James and John
        • They were ambitious
        • They had completely failed to understand Jesus
          • The amazing thing is not the fact that this incident happened, but when it happened
          • It is the juxtaposition of Jesus’ most definite and detailed forecast of His death and this request that is staggering
          • Words were powerless to rid them of the idea of a Messiah of earthly power and glory. Only the cross could do that
        • But when we have said all that is to be said againset James and John, this story tells us one shining thing about them
          • Bewildered as they might be, they still believed in Jesus
          • Misguided James and John might be, but their hearts were in the right place. They never doubted Jesus’ ultimate triumph
      • This story tells us something of Jesus’ standard of greatness
        • He was telling these two disciples that without a cross there can never be a crown
        • The standard of greatness in the kingdom is the standard of the cross
        • It was true that in the days to come they do go through the experience of their Maser, for James was beheaded by Herod Agrippa, and John suffered much for Christ
        • They accepted the challenge of their Master—even if they did so blindly
      • Jesus told them that the ultimate issue of things belonged to God
  • Mark 10:41-45
  • 41 When the ten disciples heard this, they began to be indignant with James and John. 42 Jesus called them over and said to them, “You know that those who are regarded as rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and those in high positions act as tyrants over them. 43 But it is not so among you. On the contrary, whoever wants to become great among you will be your servant, 44 and whoever wants to be first among you will be a slave to all. 45 For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”
    • Inevitably the action of James and John aroused deep resentment among the other ten
    • Jesus called them to Him and made quite clear the different standards of greatness in His kingdom and the kingdoms of the world
    • In the kingdoms of the world, the standard of greatness was power
      • How many people does a man control
    • In the kingdom of Jesus the standard was that of service
      • Greatness consisted not in reducing others to one’s service, but in reducing oneself to their service
      • The test was not what service can I extract, but what service can I give
      • The basic trouble is that it is human nature to want to do as little as possible and to get as much as possible
      • It is only when we are filled with the desire to put into life more than we take out that life for ourselves and for others will be happy and prosperous
      • The world needs people whose ideal is service—it needs people who have realized what sound sense Jesus spoke
    • He had come, He said, to give His life as a ransom for many
      • This saying of Jesus is a simple and pictorial way of saying that it cost the life of Jesus to bring men and women back from their sin into the love of God
      • It means that the cost of our salvation was the cross of Christ
      • Beyond that we cannot go
      • We know only that something happened on the cross which opened for us the way to God
  • Mark 10:46-52
  • 46 They came to Jericho. And as he was leaving Jericho with his disciples and a large crowd, Bartimaeus (the son of Timaeus), a blind beggar, was sitting by the road. 47 When he heard that it was Jesus of Nazareth, he began to cry out, “Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!” 48 Many warned him to keep quiet, but he was crying out all the more, “Have mercy on me, Son of David!” 49 Jesus stopped and said, “Call him.” So they called the blind man and said to him, “Have courage! Get up; he’s calling for you.” 50 He threw off his coat, jumped up, and came to Jesus. 51 Then Jesus answered him, “What do you want me to do for you?” “Rabboni,” the blind man said to him, “I want to see.” 52 Jesus said to him, “Go, your faith has saved you.” Immediately he could see and began to follow Jesus on the road.
    • For Jesus the end of the road was not far away
      • Jericho was only about fifteen miles from Jerusalem 
      • Jesus was on His way to the Passover
      • When a distinguished Rabbi or teacher was on such a journey, it was the custom that he was surrounded by a crowd of people, disciples and learners, who listened to him as he discoursed while he walked
      • It was the law that every male Jew over 12 years old who lived within 15 miles of Jerusalem must attend the Passover, but this simply wasn’t feasible
      • Those who were unable to go were in the habit of lining the streets of towns and villages through which groups of Passover pilgrims must pass to bid them godspeed on their way
      • So then the streets of Jericho would be lined with people
    • Jericho had one special characteristic
      • There were attached to the Temple over 20,000 priests and as many Levites
      • Very many of these priests and Levites resided in Jericho when they were not on actual temple duty
    • At the northern gate sat a beggar, Bartimaeus
      • To those listening to Jesus’ teaching as He walked, the uproar of Bartimaeus was offensive
      • They tried to silence him, but on one was going to take from him his chance to escape from his world of darkness, and he cried with such violence and persistence that the procession stopped, and he was brought to Jesus
        • In this story we see the sheer persistence of Bartimaeus
          • In the mind of Bartimaeus there was not just a vague, wistful, sentimental wish to see Jesus
          • It was a desperate desire, and it is that disparage desire that gets things done
        • His response to the call of Jesus was immediate and eager, so eager that he threw off his coat to run to Jesus
          • Many people hear the call of Jesus but say in effect, “Wait until I have done this or have finished that.”
          • Certain chances only happen once
          • So ver often we do not seize the moment to act on it—and the chance is gone, maybe forever
        • He knew precisely what he wanted—his sight
          • It should be so with us and Jesus
          • And that involves the one thing that so few people wish to face—self-examination
          • When we go to Jesus, if we are as desperately definite as Bartimaeus, things will happen
        • Bartimaeus had a quite inadequate conception of Jesus
          • Son of David was a messianic title, but it has in it all the thought of a conquering Messiah, a king of David’s line who would lead Israel to national greatness
            • Bartimaeus had faith though
            • The demand is not hat we should fully understand Jesus
            • The demand is for faith
        • Bartimaeus may have been a beggar by the wayside but he was a man of gratitude
          • Having received his sight, he followed Jesus
          • He did not selfishly go on his way when his need was met
          • He began with need, went on to gratitude, and finished with loyalty—and that is a perfect summary of the stages of discipleship

Mark 10:13-31 (Wednesday Evening Bible Study)

Mark 10:13-31

  • Mark 10:13-16
  • 13 People were bringing little children to him in order that he might touch them, but the disciples rebuked them. 14 When Jesus saw it, he was indignant and said to them, “Let the little children come to me. Don’t stop them, because the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. 15 Truly I tell you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.” 16 After taking them in his arms, he laid his hands on them and blessed them.
    • It was natural that Jewish mothers should wish their children to be blessed by a great and distinguished Rabbi. Especially they brought their children to such a person on their first birthday
    • We will fully understand the almost poignant beauty of this passage only if we remember when it happened. Jesus was on the way to the cross, and He knew it
      • Even with such a tension in His mind as that, He had time to take them in His arms and He had the heart to smile into their faces and maybe to play with them for a while
      • The disciples were not necessarily rude and uncivilized. They were simply trying to protect Jesus
        • They knew quite clearly that tragedy lay ahead and they could see the tension under which Jesus labored
        • They didn’t want Him to be bothered
        • They could not conceive that He could want the children around Him at such a time
      • Jesus said to let the children come to Him
        • This tells us that He was the kind of person who cared for children and for whom children cared
        • He could not have been a stern and gloomy and joyless person
        • He must have smiled easily and laughed joyfully 
        • This small story throws a flood of light on the human kind of person Jesus was
      • What is it about children that Jesus liked and valued so much?
        • There is the child’s humility
          • Ordinarily children are embarrassed by prominence and publicity
          • They have not yet learned to think in terms of place and pride and privilege
          • They have not yet learned to discover the importance of themselves
        • There is the child’s obedience
          • Their natural instinct is to obey
          • They have not yet learned the pride and false independence which separate us from one another and from God
        • There is the child’s trust
          • It is seen in the child’s acceptance of authority
            • Children often believe that their parents can do no wrong and know everything
            • Instinctively children realize their own ignorance and their own helplessness and trust the ones they think know
          • It is seen in the child’s confidence in other people
            • Children do not expect people to be bad
            • Children have not yet learned to suspect the world; they still believe the best about others
        • The child has a short memory
          • Children have not yet learned to bear grudges and nourish bitterness
          • Even when they are unjustly treated, they forget, and forget so completely that they do not even need to forgive
  • Mark 10:17-22
  • 17 As he was setting out on a journey, a man ran up, knelt down before him, and asked him, “Good teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?” 18 “Why do you call me good?” Jesus asked him. “No one is good except God alone. 19 You know the commandments: Do not murder; do not commit adultery; do not steal; do not bear false witness; do not defraud; honor your father and mother. 20 He said to him, “Teacher, I have kept all these from my youth.” 21 Looking at him, Jesus loved him and said to him, “You lack one thing: Go, sell all you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.” 22 But he was dismayed by this demand, and he went away grieving, because he had many possessions.
    • We must note how the man came and how Jesus met him
      • He came running and flung himself at Jesus’ feet
      • There is something amazing in the sight of this rich, young ruler falling and the feet of the penniless Jesus, who was on the way to being an outlaw
      • Good Teacher!
        • Jesus answered back basically, “No flattery! Don’t call me good! Keep that word for God!”
        • It looks almost as if Jesus was trying to pour cold water on that young enthusiasm
      • It is clear that this man came to Jesus in a moment of overflowing emotion
        • Jesus basically said, “Stop and think! Don’t get carried away by your excitement. I don’ want you swept to me by a moment of emotion Think calmly about what you are doing.”
        • Jesus wasn’t trying to brush the man off. He was telling hime even at the very outset to count the cost
      • Jesus was saying, “You cannot become a Christian by devotion to me. You must look at God
        • The danger is that the pupil, the scholar, the young person may form a personal attachment to the teacher or preacher and think that it is an attachment to God
          • Teachers and preachers must never point to themselves; they must always point to God
          • Teachers and preachers are in the last analysis only pointers to God (prophet)
    • Never did any story so lay down the essential Christian truth that respectability is enough
      • Jesus quoted the commandments which were the basis of the decent life; and all but one were negative commandments
      • The man answered “I never in my life did anyone any harm.”
      • But the real question is “What good have you done?”
      • Jesus was even more pointed with this individual
        • “ With all your possessions and wealth, what positive good have you done to others? How much have you gone out of your way tot help and comfort and strengthen others as you might have done?”
        • Respectability consists in not doing things; Christianity consists in doing things
        • That was precisely where this man, like so many of us, failed
    • Jesus confronted him with a challenge
      • Get out of the moral respectability trap; stop looking at goodness as consisting in not doing things
      • Take yourself and all that you have, and spend everything on others; Then you will find true happiness in time and in eternity
        • Sadly, the man couldn’t do it
        • True, he had never stolen and he had never defrauded anyone, but neither had he ever been positively and sacrificially generous
        • It may be respectable never to take away from anyone; It is Christian to give to someone
      • Jesus basic and essential question: “How much do you want real Christianity? Do you want it enough to give away your possessions?” Or whatever it is that is keeping you from fully following Jesus
      • We all want goodness, but so few of us want it enough to pay the price
      • Jesus looked at the man with love
        • There was the appeal of love
          • Jesus was not angry with him
          • He loved him too much for that
          • It was not the look of anger but the appeal of love
        • There was the challenge to moral courage
          • It was a look which sought to pul the man out of his comfortable, respectable, settled life into the adventure of being a real Christian
        • It was the look of grief
          • The grief of seeing a man deliberately choose not to be what he might have been and hand it in him to be
  • Mark 10:23-27
  • 23 Jesus looked around and said to his disciples, “How hard it is for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God!” 24 The disciples were astonished at his words. Again Jesus said to them, “Children, how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God! 25 It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God.” 26 They were even more astonished, saying to one another, “Then who can be saved?” 27 Looking at them, Jesus said, “With man it is impossible, but not with God, because all things are possible with God.”
    • Then Jesus turned the discussion back to His own disciples
      • How hard it is for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God!
      • The word used for wealth  is defined by Aristotle as, “All those things of which the value is measured by coinage.”
      • The reason for the amazement of the disciples was that Jesus was turning accepted Jewish standards completely upside down
        • It was believed that prosperity was the sign of a good man
        • If a man was rich, God must have honored and blessed him
        • The disciples would have argued that the more prosperous people were, the more certain they were of entry into the kingdom
        • Jesus’ response was basically “How difficult it is for those who have put their trust in riches to enter the kingdom.”
      • No one ever saw the dangers of prosperity and of material things more clearly than Jesus did. What are these dangers
        • Material possessions tend to fix our hearts to this world
        • If our main interest is in material possessions, it tends to make us think of everything in terms of price
          • If our main interest in in material things, we will think in terms of price and not in terms of value
          • We may well forget there are values in this world far beyond money, that there are things which have no price, and that there are precious things that money cannot buy
          • It is fatal to begin to think that everything worth having has a monetary value
        • Jesus would have said that the possession of material goods is two things
          • It is an acid test of character
            • It takes a really big and good person to bear it worthily
          • It is a responsibility
            • We will always be judged by two standards; how we got our possessions and how we use them
            • Will we use what we have selfishly or generously
            • Will we use it as if we had undisputed possession of it, or remembering that we hold it in stewardship from God
      • The reaction of the disciples was that if what Jesus was saying was true, to be saved at all was basically impossible
        • Jesus then stated the whole doctrine of salvation in a nutshell
          • If salvation depended on a person’s own efforts it would be impossible for anyone. But salvation is the gift of God and all things are possible to Him.
        • Those who trust in themselves and in their possessions can never be saved. Those who trust in the saving power and the redeeming love of God can enter freely into salvation
  • Mark 10:28-31
  • 28 Peter began to tell him, “Look, we have left everything and followed you.” 29 “Truly I tell you,” Jesus said, “there is no one who has left house or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or fields for my sake and for the sake of the gospel, 30 who will not receive a hundred times more, now at this time—houses, brothers and sisters, mothers and children, and fields, with persecutions —and eternal life in the age to come. 31 But many who are first will be last, and the last first.”
    • Peter couldn’t help drawing the contrast between that man and himself and his friends
    • Just as the man had refused Jesus, he and his friends had accepted the call, and Peter with almost crude honesty of his wanted to know what he and his friends were to get out of it
    • Jesus’s answer falls into three section
      • He said that no one ever gave up anything for the sake of Himself and of His good news without getting it back a hundredfold
        • A person’s Christianity might involve the loss of home and friends and loved ones, but entry into the Christian Church brought with it a family far greater and wider than the one left behind—a new spiritual family
        • Becoming a Christian may mean sacrificing ties that are very dear, but anyone who does so becomes a member of a family as wide as earth and heaven
      • Jesus added two things
        • He added the simple words “and persecutions”
          • He’s removing the whole matter from the world of quid pro quo
          • They take away the idea of a material reward for a material sacrifice
          • He never offered an easy way
          • He made it clear that to be a Christian is a costly thing
        • This tells us that Jesus never used a bribe to make people follow Him
          • He used a challenge
          • Certainly you will get your reward, but you will have to show yourself big enough and brave enough to get it
          • He did not call men and women to win the rewards of time. He called them to earn the blessings of eternity. God has not only this world in which to repay
      • Then Jesus added a warning
        • Many who are first shall be last
        • This was a warning to Peter who may have been estimating his own worth and his own reward and assessing them high
        • The final standard of judgment is with God. Many may stand well in the judgment of the world, but the judgment of God may upset the world’s judgment. Still more; many may stand well in their own judgment, and find that God’s evaluation of them is very different
        • It’s a warning against all pride
        • It’s a warning that the ultimate judgments belong to God who alone knows the motives of human hearts
        • It is a warning that the judgments of heaven may well upset the reputations of earth.